Planetary systems and their changing theories

table of contents of "Planetary systems and their changing theories" next topic

4. Other worlds predicted and interpreted by theory: Limit of growth in a disk: does it exist?

The theory up to 1996 predicted ~1 Jupiter mass as a gap-opening mass (in a standard solar nebula), and identified it with the mass limit.
Gap formation was synonymous with the termination of planet growth.

The concept of an impermeable gap around the secondary component was also standard in disk-binary star interaction theory.


Much has changed since then in the disk-binary theory and observations:


Regarding the planets, Artymowicz & Lubow (1996) suggested that under favorable conditions mass may flow through circumplanetary gap in protoplanetary disks, to convert Jupiters into superplanets in some exoplanetary systems.

They pointed out (Artymowicz & Lubow 1997) that large planets are no less effective in accreting through the gap than huge secondaries (i.e. stars) because the gap is much wider and presumably not easier to cross in binary stars, compared with the planetary systems.

We have confirmed this hypothesis with a wide range of numerical methods (Artymowicz, Lubow, and Kley 1998).
We use the following top-rated, variable resolution hydrodynamical methods to study the flows and disk-planet interaction:

  1. SPH = Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, a Lagrangean (particle) method.
  2. Monotonic Transport code of Kley,
  3. PPM = Piece-wise Parabolic Method in a Lagrangean+Eulerian formulation
  4. Zeus code
Our models are carefully tested adaptations and developments of the above methods for the specific disk-planet problem.
Some results of SPH (from Artymowicz & Lubow 1997, Tenerife conf. proc., in print):
a 5 Jupiter mass planet, accreting through a disk gap via extensions of stream-like features. The empty circle on the right is approximately the size of the Roche lobe of the planet.

Some early results of a Monotonic Transport Hydrocode.

The horizontal axis in this plot covers the whole range of azimuthal angle phi from 0 to 360 degrees. The vertical axis is radius, in terms of planetary radius. (The planets has 1 Jupiter mass and a circular orbit.) Suface density is color-coded.
The gap was created by a planet (horizontal dark band) but there is some gas crossing the gap, in a form of spiral shock waves reaching down to the Lagrange points of the planet (the vertically elongated object in the gap is the Roche lobe being filled by gas).


The figure below, obtained at higher resolution by the same method, was published in a recent Science magazine editorial by J. Glanz (Science, 30 May 97, special issue on stellar astronomy). The caption said "Feeding frenzy. Even after a newborn giant planet tears a gap in a protoplanetary disk, material might stream in and feed continued growth."

And by clicking here you can see a detailed version of a zoom on the planet region with superimposed flow field, simulated with monotonic transport code:



Some results of a Piecewise Parabolic Method hydrocode.


An accreting Jupiter (Roche lobe emptied during simulation) in r-phi coordinate surface density plot:

In this simulation, Jupiter would double in mass in time equal to 5*104 P (orbital periods), i.e. 0.6 Myr, if the surrounding disk has mass 0.01 Msun, despite a very wide gap extending to 1:2 and 2:1 orbital commensurabilities. (Realistic gap sizes are expected to be somewhat smaller for Jupiter). This simulation could thus produce a superplanet during the lifetime of a solar nebula.


Finally, we provide two pictures zooming in on the region around the Roche lobe of the (non-accreting) proto-Jupiter. (The Roche lobe radius equals 0.069 times the orbital radius of a Jupiter.)

The first JPEG picture below is a top view of gas density distribution around the Jupiter-sized protoplanet (center) that opened a gap in the solar nebula-type disk.
It will be published, among others, in the proceedings of XIX Rencontres de Blois, "Planetary systems: the long view" (Artymowicz, Lubow, and Kley 1997). Disk properties are as above (e.g., viscosity parameter alpha=10-3 is used in Navier-Stokes viscous terms; z/r=0.05). The numerical grid near the planet has resolution approximately 0.009 times the star-planet distance. Thus, we begin to resolve the structure in gas flowing into the white oval, representing the sphere of influence or Roche lobe of the planet. Spiral shocks bridge the disk gap and supply the growing planet with gas through the cusps on the Roche lobe (Lagrange points).
Most of the disk gas returns to disk after passing the shock, but a small fraction hitting the shock near the L points falls inside the Roche lobe. Additional rarefied gas streams directly from the horeseshoe orbits in the gap.

The above picture appeared in a popular article on extrasolar planets by Geoff Marcy and Paul Butler (HTML).


Below we show the enlargement of gas density around the much better resolved Roche lobe of Jupiter from another simulation (PPM, P.A. 1999). Several features are evident:
The wakes are seen on both sides of the Roche lobe, resembling in nature the keel-water of a boat or a shock wave behind a supersonic plane (of course most of the disk does rotate supersonically with respect to the planet).
The wake joins the bow shock in front of the Roche lobe, intercepting the gas streaming along the horseshoe orbits. But this set of shocks is much less apparent than the third set of shocks, which are found inside the circumplanetary disk inside the lobe. The very pronounced m=2 wave results from the external flow configuration. The flow is analysed in detail in a paper in Astroph. J. (Dec. 1999) by Lubow, Seibert and Artymowicz. The central gas clump is a poorly resolved, small circumjovian disk.

Similar circumplanetary flows were also obtained in Zeus hydrocode and SPH-based runs.


All our results support the hypothesis that, contrary to the common assumption,
the tidal gap opening does not provide a principal limitation on planet growth in a disk.
In other words, there is always some gas flow from inner and outer disk onto the planet; the only question is whether in a particular disk it is efficient enough to trasform a giant in to a 'supergiant' planet. Our simulations show that it is, for many plausible disk models. Therefore, reasons involving disk lifetime (the timing of disk dispersal) and the availability of sufficient amount of gas might determine the final (super)planet masses.

(Incidentally, this is not a new idea. Similar conclusions as to the masses of 3 out of 4 giant planets in the solar system (all except Jupiter) have been reached already in the standard theories from the 1980s.)

All this, together with the eccentricity excitation mechanism discussed earlier, provides a plausible and self-contained scenario for the origin of superplanets in some extrasolar systems, not necessarily typical, perhaps those which possessed long-lived, or massive, or unusually viscous, or hot disks.

The formation of brown dwarfs in some disks is entirely possible, though may be rare, mainly because of insufficient disk mass.


Preliminary results of PPM calculation of planets of various masses in different disks are shown in http://www.astro.su.se/~pawel/planets/results.html .
table of contents next topic (Conclusions page)